Back in that 2015 debate Donald J. Trump stood unafraid and alone. Fox News set up Donald J. Trump to fail but instead by standing tall, Trump won. After that debate Big Media focused on that one moment. Big Media declared “it’s over for Trump”. We declared it was Trump’s moment of triumph:
The best moment for Trump is when he stood alone, in an arena filled with Republicans/conservatives, next to the major Republican candidates for president, in front of the stars of Fox News, before the biggest Fox News audience ever, and said, ‘I’ll stand with America… P.U.M.A.!
Who did events prove to be correct? Our analysis was a Trump debate victory precisely because he stood on principle and said “P.U.M.A.!”
At that August 2015 debate Donald J. Trump spoke as a leader unafraid of taking on his own party. Trump won. After Trump became the nominee it is those that denounced Trump’s “disloyal” answer who have failed to live up to their pledge to support the party nominee.
And so it goes that after the Las Vegas debate Republicans such as Jeb Bush and John Kasich continue to refuse to live up their honor bound pledge and instead attack Donald J. Trump. Trump haters such as Jeff Flake and Lindsey Graham are horrified that Trump will not preemptively concede an election even if the election is won by fraud perpetrated against the American voter.
As corrupt as the dishonorable Republicans are in their denunciations of Donald J. Trump for his smart answer last night, Hillary Clinton and those who support her today denouncing Trump are far worse. The case can be summed up in six letters: A L G O R E:
Horrifying! Trump “upends a basic pillar of American democracy” by saying he will wait and see what happens on election day, because of his concern about voter fraud.
But wait! Who was the last candidate who refused to accept the result on election day, as certified by election authorities? Al Gore. Did Gore “upend a basic pillar of American democracy” when he tried to overturn the result of the 2000 election? I don’t remember the Associated Press saying so at the time. In fact, I would bet that the authors of this piece of AP hysteria were rooting for Gore, at the time. Unbelievable.
Al Gore was correct to contest the 2000 election. The will of the voters should always be paramount and if necessary defended in court. But now the totalitarian force that is the Obama Dimocrat Party will not tolerate the honorable fight to defend the will of the voters in the face of voter and election fraud.
While Gore tried to stress the importance of voting he referenced his loss to George W. Bush in 2000. As the crowd begins chanting “YOU WON! YOU WON!” Watch Mrs. Clinton smile and nod in agreement. [snip]
As the crowd chanted and Hillary smiled and nodded approvingly, Gore continued his thought process by suggesting that he actually won the 2000 election by warning the young voters to not be in a position “years from now” welcoming Hillary Clinton and saying to her “actually you did win, it just wasn’t close enough to make sure that the votes were counted.”
Through this entire sequence, Mrs. Clinton continued to smile and nod in agreement.
Matt Drudge linked to many instances of Democrats, such as John Kerry, decrying rigged elections. A profile of Secretary of State John Kerry published Sunday in The New Yorker reveals that, 11 years after his election loss to George W. Bush in 2004, Kerry still believes he was robbed via systematic fraud.
What about the voters? In recent weeks we have seen example after example of Dimocratic Party systemic fraud in videos released by Project Veritas and others.
A defiant Donald Trump used the high-profile setting of the final presidential debate here Wednesday night to amplify one of the most explosive charges of his candidacy: that if he loses the election, he might consider the outcome illegitimate because the process is rigged.
Questioned directly as to whether he would accept the outcome should Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton prevail on Nov. 8, Trump demurred. “I will keep you in suspense,” the Republican nominee said. Clinton called Trump’s answer “horrifying,” saying he was “talking down our democracy.”
Trump defends our democracy when he defends a legitimate vote count and attacks election and voter fraud. It was a great moment among many great moments for Donald J. Trump. Even the naysayers who shout “it’s over for Trump” time and time again, admit Trump had a good night:
The evening was by far and away his best performance. Trump hit on all the major themes that his campaign is built upon: economic growth, strong national security, fighting illegal immigration, changing the direction of the country by fighting special interests, corruption and bureaucracy as well as ensuring a Conservative Supreme Court. He had especially good moments in criticizing Clinton’s foreign policy record and her email practices as well as Obama’s failed policies at home and abroad.
All was not easy in Las Vegas for Donald J. Trump. After all, Trump had to debate three people not just one. Donald J. Trump had to at times debate Chris Wallace. Donald J. Trump had to at times debate the private Hillary Clinton. Donald J. Trump had to at times debate the public Hillary Clinton.
Donald Trump also had to sometimes fight with himself because time and again Trump had to resist his inclination to fight back against Hillary’s smart tactic of goading Trump. Trump successfully resisted allowing himself to be goaded and that helped him enormously. By not falling into the trap of being goaded into distractions, Trump was able to have several other good moments:
Donald J. Trump had many and the most good moments at the debate. Hillary Clinton had some good moments as well. The best part of the debate for Hillary Clinton was that she looked great. Her pantsuit was OK. Her makeup excellent. Her lighting was perfection. Hillary Clinton as usual made a great presentation. Hillary Clinton prepares very well and it shows. Hillary Clinton was articulate. Hillary Clinton was masterful. But too often Hillary Clinton appeared hateful because she imitated her running mate Tim Kaine and talked and talked and tried to appear as if she would win the debate because it would be determined by word count. So Hillary talked and talked over Trump and refused to stop talking and talked and talked and talked.
Hillary talked so much. The problem was that it was difficult to determine if the Hillary talking was the private or the public Hillary. And it was on that point, which we had urged Donald J. Trump to focus on, that Donald J. Trump conveyed a moment of clarity to the viewing audience which undermined all of Hillary Clinton’s incessant talk.
The lengthy transcript of this exchange will be posted in the comments because it includes some substantive policy matters and to show the incessant interruptions. Here is the moment in video:
The transcript of that exchange is filled with a clear example of public Hillary Clinton trying to avoid private Hillary Clinton. The chase was not pretty as private Hillary ran like a dog to catch the public Hillary car only to meet with the usual catastrophic results of when dog catches car:
WALLACE: All right. Let’s move on to the subject of immigration. And there is almost no issue that separates the two of you more than the issue of immigration. Actually, there are a lot of issues that separate the two of you. Mr. Trump, you want to build a wall. Secretary Clinton, you have offered no specific plan for how you want to secure our southern border. Mr. Trump, you are calling for major deportations. Secretary Clinton, you say that within your first 100 days as president you’re going to offer a package that includes a pathway to citizenship. The question, really, is, why are you right and your opponent wrong? Mr. Trump, you go first in this segment. You have two minutes.
TRUMP: Well, first of all, she wants to give amnesty, which is a disaster and very unfair to all of the people that are waiting on line for many, many years. We need strong borders. In the audience tonight, we have four mothers of I mean, these are unbelievable people that I’ve gotten to know over a period of years whose children have been killed, brutally killed by people that came into the country illegally. You have thousands of mothers and fathers and relatives all over the country. They’re coming in illegally. Drugs are pouring in through the border. We have no country if we have no border. Hillary wants to give amnesty. She wants to have open borders. [snip]
WALLACE: Secretary Clinton, I want to clear up your position on this issue, because in a speech you gave to a Brazilian bank, for which you were paid $225,000, we’ve learned from the WikiLeaks, that you said this, and I want to quote. “My dream is a hemispheric common market with open trade and open borders.” So that’s the question…
TRUMP: Thank you.
WALLACE: That’s the question. Please quiet, everybody. Is that your dream, open borders?
CLINTON: Well, if you went on to read the rest of the sentence, I was talking about energy. You know, we trade more energy with our neighbors than we trade with the rest of the world combined. And I do want us to have an electric grid, an energy system that crosses borders. I think that would be a great benefit to us. But you are very clearly quoting from WikiLeaks. And what’s really important about WikiLeaks is that the Russian government has engaged in espionage against Americans. They have hacked American websites, American accounts of private people, of institutions. Then they have given that information to WikiLeaks for the purpose of putting it on the Internet. This has come from the highest levels of the Russian government, clearly, from Putin himself, in an effort, as 17 of our intelligence agencies have confirmed, to influence our election.
CLINTON: So I actually think the most important question of this evening, Chris, is, finally, will Donald Trump admit and condemn that the Russians are doing this and make it clear that he will not have the help of Putin in in this election, that he rejects Russian espionage against Americans, which he actually encouraged in the past? Those are the questions we need answered. We’ve never had anything like this happen in any of our elections before.
TRUMP: That was a great pivot off the fact that she wants open borders, OK? How did we get on to Putin?
It’s a clarifying exchange. It is the moment when the private Hillary with the help of Donald J. Trump catches the public Hillary. Private Hillary is for open borders. Hillary’s dream of “open borders” is not the nonsense she spewed out about “energy”.
Open borders is about immigration. Donald J. Trump’s signature issue is border security and the elimination of illegal immigration which undermines wages for the working class of all races in this country. It was a moment of great clarity.
It was the moment private Hillary Clinton defeated public Hillary Clinton at the debate. It was the moment Hillary Clinton lost the debate.
Donald J. Trump won the debate when he stood up for the integrity of the voting system and against election fraud and voter fraud.
Hillary Clinton lost the debate when she surrendered America to open borders even as Donald J. Trump promised to defend the integrity of America’s borders.
Now the voters decide. It’s no longer a matter of what kind of America we want. The question is do we even want an America? It’s an existential question. This election like the one in 1860 is about the very existence of the United States. Do we continue to exist or do we want the nightmare of open borders, TPP, and the continued destruction of America?
Trump won the debate because Americans want a change from the gangster government of today to an honest government of election integrity and secure borders. Americans want change from the corrupt gangster government of Barack Obama and to Make America Great Again. That’s why Trump wins.
We will watch/listen tonight to see if the Trump campaign at the highest level will utilize a certain CC/C line of attack. If not tonight, perhaps in the coming days. We’ll see tonight. If CC/C comes into play, we’ll cheer.
Tonight the topics as announced by the moderator Chris Wallace will be:
The topics selected by Wallace, not necessarily to be brought up in this order, include:
Debt and entitlements
Foreign hot spots
Fitness to be President
The format calls for six 15-minute time segments, with each 15-minute segment focusing on each of the topics.
Things for Trump and Hillary to remember: (1) it’s the economy stupid, (2) this is a change election and the candidate of change wins; (3) Hillary will goad Trump as her smartest strategy and maybe even attack Trump’s family; (4) Trump should talk about grand themes and not allow himself to be goaded – reply CC/C.
Trump’s guests tonight include the mother of slain American Sean Smith who died in Benghazi and that was an honorable invitation, as provocative as it is.
Speaking of goading, Trump also has a distraction/guest that brings the Las Vegas debate into the realm of a really big show.
I'm sorry my brother could not be a great president. But trump will fix it!
Donald J. Trump has a sweet big problem for Wednesday’s third and final presidential debate. Trump’s problem is to select which categories of scandals – as documented by Wikileaks, Project Veritas, and the FBI, – to highlight. Debate “moderator” Chris Wallace likewise has a big decision to make too. Wallace must decide if he will break the Big Media blockade of the many scandals illuminated by Wikileaks, Project Veritas, and the FBI. Hillary Clinton’s big problem will be how to formulate the same “deny and distract” response to every question while appearing to answer every question individually and forthrightly.
Don’t focus on little lies and inconsistencies and corruptions – there are too many and you will sound like a nut the more you tell the truth – because the truth is so hideous it appears to be written in an insane asylum not the halls of power whence it originates.
Donald J. Trump also has to focus on the grand theme of this as a “rigged election” and/or “rigged system” he has often talked about. On this grand theme Trump has evidence on two types of “rigged election”. The first is a rigged election as in actual voter fraud (as well as organized violence against Trump supporters) and election theft. Trump can cite Hillary2008 as evidence of voter fraud:
EMAILS: Clinton Allies ‘Believe The Obama Forces’ Committed Voter Fraud In ’08
Two attorneys with close ties to the Clinton family believe then-Sen. Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign “flooded” the caucuses with “ineligible voters,” according to leaked emails.
Trump also has to declare and demonstrate the election is rigged by Big Media and via ballot fraud/voter fraud. Big Media is the enemy as are those who proactively steal our votes with ineligible votes. Donald J. Trump understands the links between the rigged election and the Big Media connection:
The election is absolutely being rigged by the dishonest and distorted media pushing Crooked Hillary – but also at many polling places – SAD
The likelihood is that Donald J. Trump will have to thematically lay out his case without help from Chris Wallace, the moderator. But it is possible that self-interest will lead Wallace to break the Big Media cartel blockade of how Big Media has rigged this election.
Media CAN'T cover WikiLeaks Podesta shitstorm – because so much of it involves them! Will take a generation to recover from this corruption.
Chris Wallace of Fox News could ask Hillary Clinton about the hefty bag of sh*t called Donna Brazile. We recall how in 2008 CNN fired Paul Begala and James Carville because CNN wanted “impartial” analysis. CNN kept Barack Obama shill Donna Brazile on air even as she attacked this website and demanded that Hillary Clinton close this website down. Now the bag of sh*t has been caught giving Hillary2016 inside campaign information from the DNC (she is now Chair of that corruption). Even more relevant is how Donna Brazile, bag of sh*t, gave Hillary Clinton questions to be asked by CNN at a debate.
Chris Wallace should ask Hillary Clinton if anyone at Fox News gave her the questions to the debate to which Hillary Clinton will respond with a clear “no”. Wallace can then follow up by asking Hillary Clinton whether she thinks it is corrupt to take insider information about debate questions and whether she thinks CNN is corrupt in light of the fact that CNN has done nothing, no investigation as to how Hillary Clinton acquired debate questions, no investigation as to Donna Brazile’s role, no investigation as to Roland Martin’s role. No investigation by CNN as their debate questions leaked to a candidate they clearly favor.
Chris Wallace should explore the Big Media corruption and rigged election. If not, Donald J. Trump will have to be the hero.
To everything, to every question, Hillary Clinton’s strategy should be, and will be, to goad Donald J. Trump and to turn all the talk to sex. As we have advised, Donald J. Trump should not allow himself to be goaded but rather should turn this strategy of sex talk goading into a tactical victory. This means Donald J. Trump should respond with an answer designed to appeal to young women who will vote for Hillary Clinton in 2016. Donald J. Trump could say that any young woman who votes for Hillary Clinton should recall how Hillary Clinton attacked a young woman Bill Clinton used as a cigar humidor.
Trump’s ethics plan will be one thematic hook to be conjoined with the Big Media and voter fraud themes. The “private view” versus “public” lies should be another thematic grand stroke.
We have another grand thematic masterstroke which Trump should employ if anyone from his campaign should be interested. We might write about it tomorrow before the debate.
The most important of the grand themes Trump should highlight tomorrow is a variation of the Make America Great Again leitmotiv which courses through the Trump opera.
To our thinking from all the many leaks and emails thus far released there is one email which should take prominence. Possibly the most important email released thus far for Donald J. Trump to highlight Wednesday night:
Wikileaks drops the smoking gun on the Iran Deal—
John Podesta thinks nuclear war is coming!
From today’s Wikileaks release:
John Anzalone to John Podesta (quoting Sen. Kirk of IL): “This agreement condemns the next generation to cleaning up a nuclear war in the Persian Gulf… This is the greatest appeasement since Chamberlain gave Czechoslovakia to Hitler.”
John Podesta’s reply: “Yup.”
My God people…they actually expect nuclear war.
And the paid the terrorist Iranian regime as much as $33.6 billion in cash and gold payments.
Nuclear war in the aftermath of Obama appeasement. In this election the stakes are that high. Donald J. Trump might have to change his theme from “Make America Great Again” to “Save America Once Again”.
How big a malicious dope is Paul Ryan? How corrupt and destructive to America is Big Media? Let’s look at the dope first then the corrosive effect of Big Media corruption in our elections.
Before last Friday Paul Ryan was in a win/win position. Paul Ryan was forced by the GOP grass roots to issue a limp endorsement of Donald J. Trump and that phony endorsement freed Paul Ryan to constantly attack Donald J. Trump and never say a word in any way critical about Hillary2016. Paul Ryan was in a sweet spot.
Paul Ryan was in a win/win position no matter what happened in November. If Hillary2016 won Paul Ryan saw himself as the premier Republican leader, as he would have been. More importantly, Paul Ryan wants to pass TPP and illegal immigration amnesty and a Trump loss in November would allow Speaker Ryan to do just that. Quisling Paul Ryan would pass the Chamber of Commerce agenda in the House. If Donald J. Trump won, Speaker Paul Ryan would be the leader of the Republican House of Representatives and Speaker Ryan would lead the Dims and a rump group of Republicans in opposition to Trump. Whatever happened in November, Paul Ryan had it gamed out as a win.
But then Paul Ryan overreached and now Paul Ryan is in a lose/lose position. If Hillary2016 wins, Paul Ryan will be booted as Speaker. If Donald J. Trump wins, Paul Ryan will be booted as Speaker. What a dope. He had it all but wanted to dump Trump to be the candidate after he knocked off Mike Pence. What a dope.
Sleazy Politico reports that in the swing states the GOP leaders are standing with Trump. This is an attack against Paul Ryan. Rasmussen polls showed Donald J. Trump on Monday behind by seven. By the end of the week Rasmussen has Trump up by two. As M. Joseph Sheppard documents, the tracking polls after some ups and downs during the week, nothing much changed on the poll front despite all the pearl clutching and hair pulling. Trump is also rebounding in the state polls.
When citizens are frustrated with the way things are going in the nation, they may be motivated to vote for change.
As we have repeatedly noted every time Chicken Little squawks “It’s over for Trump”, this is a change election. In a change election the candidate for change wins.
So what happened this past week? This past week Big Media decided to pummel Donald J. Trump with everything available because nothing thus far has made “It’s over for Trump” true. Big Media tries and tries to destroy Donald J. Trump and all that is accomplished is the American public watches the coup against the people.
Big Media is using polls to legitimize the Big Media attacks against Trump. Many of the polls are entirely cooked. Big Media attacks Trump then highlights even the least movement in the polls against Trump to demonstrate it is the people that are against Trump. But then Trump fights back. The people see Trump fight back. The people decide to stand with Trump. It’s a movement for change. Big change, not chump change.
Why do the people stand by Trump? The usually clueless home of Big Media collaborator with Hillary2016, CNBC makes a good guess:
Get ready for more Trump the pit bull that we saw on Sunday night. For some reason, when voters see Trump angrily fighting for himself, many of them take it be an example of how he’ll fight for them.
Despite all these ideological attacks and corporate desponsorship attacks, and Big Media attacks, Donald Trump is growing in popularity with the voters. Why? We explain in simple English the Donald Trump mystique:
WHEN YOU ARE IN A SNAKE PIT YOU DON’T CARE WHO HANDS YOU A STICK.
We’ve been warning about this for the longest time. In recent elections in so-called “democratic” countries – the voters are being ignored. In election after election, voters vote for an establishment political party – then once in power the political party they voted for stabs them in the back. Witness the 2014 elections in the United States in which the Republican Party won elections based on opposition to Barack Obama then once in cozy offices they pull out all the stops to assist Barack Obama to pass ObamaTrade. This happens over and over and over.
Eventually voters catch on and they decide to vote for the biggest motherf*cker around who will do what they want. The voters find themselves in a snake pit, surrounded by vipers, and they reach up to grab whatever stick is handed to them.
Big Media and the entire political ruling class are terrified of Donald J. Trump. Want to know why Big Media and the entire political ruling class is terrified of Donald J. Trump? Big Media believes they are the power which ensures the supremacy of the political ruling class. Here is how Big Media dictators think of themselves:
Those of us in the media are not mere stenographers. We decide whose voices to elevate. We amplify information. We generate the narratives that define public discourse. This isn’t an opinion about how journalists should do their jobs; it’s a statement of fact about the power of information and those who wield it.
The main difference among journalists is that some are agnostic about what happens on the other side of the editorial wall. The rest of us are not.
As we wrote years ago, Big Media has turned into a political party determined to protect it’s power. It’s why Big Media opposes the Citizens United decision. Before Citizens United, corporate power by companies such as the Washington Post Company and the New York Times Company could be wielded as a monopoly exerting political power with editorial page endorsements valued in the millions to political campaigns. Now the companies which publish and control these newspapers and broadcast outlets no longer have monopoly power. Combine the Citizens United Supreme Court decision with the rise of the internet and the ruling class finds itself in danger.
The Citizens United decision and the rise of the internet threaten the ruling class. Then to the horror of the ruling political class, Donald J. Trump stood up to challenge their corruption as well. Now with Donald J. Trump, the power of the internet, the diminished power of Big Media, the ruling class sees the glint of the guillotine.
The rise of the internet and citizen journalists is much like the invention of the printing press. Before the printing press, kings and courtiers did not care much about “public opinion”. There was no such thing as public opinion. The people did not count. Then with the printing press and the rise of the written word, public opinion became a force to contend with. Over the years the owners of the printing presses began to think themselves as lords and masters. Now they have become Big Media in control of the printing presses, the pixel presses, the broadcast news and the cable outlets. It’s time to lop off the heads of Big Media in the same way the heads of dictators and kings rolled through the streets.
It’s an idea that was born when Time Inc. merged with Warner Communications Corp. in 1989, to form Time Warner. It endured as the industry’s prevailing business model for nearly a generation, spawning such clones and mongrel breeds as Viacom, News Corp and GE’s NBC Universal. The vertically integrated media conglomerate was—or was supposed to be—many amazing things, giving a handful of companies unprecedented power over the media—and the chance to earn outsized profits in the process. But its defining characteristic was its sheer size, earning it a fitting nickname: Big Media.
But the theory behind the strategy relied on more than size. Housed under one roof, a single Big Media entity would control the means of producing and distributing media content, from magazine and books to television shows and movies, from cartoons and theme parks to sports franchises and the cable networks that carry the games to recorded music labels and music publishers. In Time Warner’s prototype of the model, it would control everything from the first letter of a Time magazine story or Warner Books novel to the last alphabet of the credits at the end of a Warner Brothers flick or HBO series based on the magazine story or the book division’s fiction.
Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Big Media is absolutely corrupt. Big Media is the enemy.
Hillary Clinton supporters from 2008 recall that election well and we remember the absolute corruption of Big Media. That was a primary election drenched in sexism and misogyny. Big Media flexed its muscles in favor of Barack Obama. Nothing Barack Obama did was focused on. Everything Hillary Clinton said or did was attacked or ignored if it was favorable. Big Media was all in for Barack Obama and all in against Hillary Clinton.
Were other people, I wondered, being possessed by our new first family?
I launched an e-mail inquiry. And learned that they were. Often, in strikingly similar ways.
Many women — not too surprisingly — were dreaming about sex with the president.
That cheap Big Media whore, Judith Warner masturbated herself on the editorial pages of the New York Times. Back in 2008 whores like Judith Warner engorged themselves watching Barack Obama’s penis while pretending to be all for woman power.
These woman power advocates of 2016 have forgotten what happened in 2008. In 2008 Big Media did everything to protect and fellate Barack Obama. That’s a fancy way of saying “blow job”. Any Hillary2016 advocate who associates themselves with Big Media only because this time Big Media is “on our side” is a whore. We have warned these whores that “what goes around comes around“. Big Media is not supporting Hillary Clinton nor did Big Media support Barack Obama. It’s the contrary. Barack Obama supported and enabled Big Media in 2008 and 2012. Now in 2016 Hillary Clinton is a whore to Big Media.
In 2008, Harry Reid claimed Barack Obama was a light skinned negro who talked OK. Biden liked Obama because Obama was clean. Big Media could find no fault with Barack Obama.
Obama’s Own Lewd Tape Emerges: Flaunts His Erection to Female Reporters [snip]
The video was captured by CNN back in 2008 while then-Senator Obama was first running for the highest office in the land. The 1:38 clip (below) features Obama seeming to proudly show off his erection to giggling female reporters, even giving them a full 360-degree display of his manhood while they cheer him on.
Big Media is the enemy. Whores like Judith Warner have been replaced in 2016 by Hillary Clinton 2008 supporters who now sing the praises of Barack and Michelle Obama and/or Hillary2016.
Wikileaks: ‘Anti-SJW’ Heat Street Founder Louise Mensch Pitched Ad Script to Hillary Clinton Campaign
Former British Conservative Party Member of Parliament and “right wing” blogger Louise Mensch privately tried to assist the Hillary Clinton campaign, emails published by Wikileaks reveal.
Mrs. Mensch runs the Rupert Murdoch-backed blog Heat Street, which claims to stand against identity politics and what it labels “social justice warriors” under the slogan “no safe spaces.”
However, its editor in chief, Mrs. Mensch, was caught writing a campaign advertisement script for the Democratic candidate – a woman who has traded off identity politics and social justice warrior politics. The ad appears to be based on the idea that Mrs. Clinton should be in office simply because she is female and is supported by “multiracial” women.
“… much rather have your girl Hillary,” Mrs. Mensch wrote in an email to Michael Kives of Creative Arts Agency (CAA), a former Clinton campaign advocate.
She said Hillary’s “intelligence [is] beyond doubt” but argued she “is not capitalizing on the yearning that we have to see a woman as President,” before scripting the campaign ad named “OUR TIME.”
Big Media is the enemy. Some in Big Media who believe the role of the media is to inform the American public have a problem with Trump because of the bias of their own circumstances. For instance the political heavyweight analyst Michael Barone is capable of seeing the bias in himself:
Overall, as I wrote on debate night, I think Clinton won the debate. Perhaps that reflects a professional writer’s prejudice in favor of people who speak, more or less, in whole sentences and paragraphs, and prejudice against those who engage in free-form, parenthetical-filled, free-association discourse. Or perhaps a former political consultant’s bias in favor of candidates who are well prepared. But on reflection and looking over the transcript, I think Trump did a fairly good job of discouraging marginal voters from voting for Clinton, more than I appreciated as I watched the debate.
Barone made that analysis of the first debate. He thought Hillary won but Barone acknowledged his bias favors the conventional candidate who speaks and strategizes in a conventional way, the way Barone would speak and strategize. Unfortunately, Barone let his prejudices and bias cloud his initial response to the first debate. Big Media power wielders should do an analysis based on their initial reactions but temper their reactions with honest assessments “on the other hand”.
Most Big Media writers no longer view their role to inform the public as their responsibility. Big Media today views their role as “not mere stenographers. We decide whose voices to elevate. We amplify information. We generate the narratives that define public discourse… the power of information and those who wield it.”
In this election it is Donald J. Trump and the people against Big Media. Nothing else matters. All else is subordinate. The thirst of the guillotine must be quenched. The ruling political class must be destroyed.
Big Media is the enemy. Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Big Media is absolutely corrupt. Big Media is the enemy.
This here Trump feller is one smart cookie. He’s a chess player yes. But he’s an even better poker player. During the primaries when the election was fixed against him in favor of Jeb Bush, Trump repeatedly said that if the Republican Party did not treat him fairly he would walk, and take his millions of voters along. The result was the Republican Party forced a loyalty oath on him, which Trump craftily used to trap the other nominees and the Party hierarchy, which in the end resulted in a Trump nomination victory.
Trump knew all about the art of the deal and Trump knew the GOP could not afford to lose his voters. As Trump won primaries, the GOP establishment in the form of the Mitt Romney clowns tried to use Ted Cruz as their cat’s paw to destroy Trump. Instead Trump beat them all. But rust never sleeps and these rusty political clowns continued to troll the streets in an attempt to scare Donald J. Trump.
Twelve days into October we can see the green felt table in the Riverboat with Donald J. Trump, in a vest, bands around his biceps, over his white cotton shirt, a Maverick style cowboy hat with silver band on his head tilted back, playing high stakes poker with blue eyed pus*y boy Paul Ryan.
Question: “When you’re not talking about politics, what do you and your father talk about?”
When you see a bush, a pus*y boy is not far behind…
Paul Ryan thought he was clever. The tricks the little blue eyed pus*y boy plays on Capitol Hill, he thought, would be used against Trump to great effect. First, before-during-after the convention, attack Trump every chance you get for whatever Trump says all the while pretending you have made your peace with the Trump nomination. Second, at a crucial moment before a debate and a few weeks before the election, finally announce at the end of a press release that you invited Donald J. Trump for the first time to a campaign event in your home district. Third, after the invitation release the tape that shocks pus*y boys, in order to destroy Trump. Fourth, signal the grassy knoll firing squad with a very public “disinvitation” and denunciation of Trump. Fifth, get pus*y boy Mormon and Romney ally Jason Chaffetz to withdraw his endorsement. Sixth, get more pus*sies to disendorse Trump. Seven, after Ayotte, McCain, and tens of other GOPers denounce Trump, have everyone call on Trump to withdraw and hint the replacement will be the VP nominee Mike Pence even though everyone knows it would be Paul Ryan.
Paul Ryan’s plan never would have worked but Ryan never thought of that, because Ryan is a pus*y boy about to be schlonged by the big fingered Trump.
Why would the Paul Ryan plan never have worked? Because Trump is a fighter that does not quit. Trump wrote the Art of the Deal so he knows how to negotiate. Trump knows when to hold them and when to fold them. In short, Trump is a smart man and Paul Ryan is a pus*y boy. The definition of a pus*y boy? A pus*y boy does not have a strong woman’s vagina – he is only good at getting fuc*ed.
So after all the plotting, pus*y boy Paul Ryan found himself at a green felt table, in a Riverboat, playing poker with Donald J. Trump, six-shooters at his side fully loaded and rarin’ to blast. Trump got dealt his hand and then pus*y boy grabbed his, um, cards. Pus*y boy Paul placed his bet that Trump would get out after Trump saw all the chips arrayed against him.
Pus*y boy Paul placed his chips on the table – Chaffetz, the Gropinator Arnold Schwarzenegger (the guy that groped all those women and who while married to a Kennedy, impregnated his own maid), John McCain (the guy that has the dirtiest mouth in D.C. having even called his own wife a “cunt” and a “whore”), and threats of more, although Trump knew pus*y boy Paul had no more chips to play. Trump knew that at the Wisconsin event Trump was disinvited from some in the home town crowd booed the pus*y boy. Trump knew that Joe Heck of Nevada was also booed for his attacks on Trump. Trump knew he held, the trump cards.
So after pus*y boy Paul placed his bet, piled all his chips in the center of the table, the moment arrived. Would Trump meet the bet? Or would Trump fold, throw down his cards in surrender? Trump did what the pus*y boy never expected. Trump not only met the bet, Trump did what Trump does – TRUMP RAISED THE STAKES!!!!!
Trump put his chips on the table. Trump’s chips are the Republican Party at every level, the House of Representatives, and the U.S. Senate. Trump made it clear: “if I walk, I take my voters with me and you lose not only the White House, the Supreme Court, the Senate but you also lose all your power in the House of Representatives.” Trump made it clear he understood that a House of Representatives run by a Republican pus*y boy and a Senate run by a self interested conniver would stand up to the next president about as much as they stood up to Barack Obama. Trump knew without him in the White House TPP would pass almost immediately as would illegal immigration amnesty – and the Supreme Court that bowed to Obama on ObamaCare would be even worse. So Trump knew his voters and the American People had nothing to lose. Without Trump in the White House it was all over. So Trump raised the stakes in an international game of poker that even James Bond would not dare play.
Members on the call with Ryan described tense exchanges. The call lasted for about 45 minutes, before abruptly ending.
However, the Republican National Committee has pledged its continued support.
Some of the GOP’s most conservative lawmakers also continue to back Trump and chastise those who have abandoned him.
“We have to get on board. It’s all in or nothing,” Texas Rep. Louie Gohmert, who was on Ryan’s call, told Fox News on Tuesday.
He said 11 House members are with Ryan, whom Gohmert also lambasted for saying his focus is now on ensuring that Clinton doesn’t enter the White House with Democrats having taken control of the House, too.
“It’s not going to happen,” said Gohmert, arguing the Republicans now control the House and Senate but have not effectively stopped the Obama administration’s agenda.
Another House member on the call said outspoken California Rep. Dana Rohrabacher called Republican leaders “cowards.”
Pus*y Ryan and the GOP establishment only have energy to attack Donald J. Trump. The GOP establishment coddles Obama. Promises from the GOP of future action are null and void ab initio.
Pus*y boy Paul thought he could play his games and win. Then Trump raised the stakes. In retrospect, Trump was always going to win.
There are some Trump supporters, Monica Crowley on Tuesday night for instance, who believe that Donald J. Trump should let surrogates attack the GOP and that Trump should only go after Hillary2016. We respectfully disagree.
We believe Donald J. Trump should continue to be unshackled for the remainder of the week. Trump has been getting his kicks in at the opposition party in the form of Hillary2016. But Donald J. Trump’s real opposition is the ruling class establishment – particularly the establishment of the Republican Party – and Big Media. We think Trump should continue to break the GOP Quislings and Big Media all this week and into next.
Trump can turn his attacks and attention against Hillary2016 after he dispatches his GOP opposition party. Next week there will be another debate. Trump can go to the debate having defeated the GOP establishment and Big Media. Then Trump can take on Hillary2016.
Donald J. Trump loves Wikileaks. Donald J. Trump loves to play high stakes poker. Donald J. Trump loves to win.
Donald J. Trump holds the trump cards. Despite all the cooked polls immediately after Friday to be followed by a dramatic rise after the second debate all the higher, Donald J. Trump will win. Why? Because it’s a change election. That’s all you need to know.
Born into slavery as one of the youngest of thirteen children of James and Elizabeth in Ulster County, New York, in 1797, Sojourner Truth’s given name was Isabella Baumfree. As almost all of her brothers and sisters had been sold to other slave owners, some of her earliest memories were of her parents’ stories of the cruel loss of their other children. [snip]
In 1843, she changed her name to Sojourner Truth – her name for a traveling preacher, one who speaks the truth – and left New York. She traveled throughout New England, where she met and worked with abolitionists such as William Lloyd Garrison, and Frederick Douglass. Her life story, The Narrative of Sojourner Truth: A Northern Slave, written with the help of friend Olive Gilbert, was published in 1850.
While traveling and speaking in states across the country, Sojourner Truth met many women abolitionists and noticed that although women could be part of the leadership in the abolitionist movement, they could neither vote nor hold public office. It was this realization that led Sojourner to become an outspoken supporter of women’s rights.
In 1851, she addressed the Women’s Rights Convention in Akron, Ohio, delivering her famous speech “Ain’t I a Woman?” The applause she received that day has been described as “deafening.” From that time on, she became known as a leading advocate for the rights of women. She became one of the nineteenth century’s most eloquent voices for the cause of anti-slavery and women’s rights.
February 1, 2009
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the President of Gays & Lesbians in Foreign Affairs Agencies met with each other on Friday, along with other heads of affinity groups from the State Department, during which time Clinton again voiced her pledge to review the inequities in how the State Department treats its gay and straight employees.
Michelle Schohn, president of Gays & Lesbians in Foreign Affairs Agencies, raised the issue of how the department treats its gay employees during the brief meeting, and Clinton again promised to review current policies. Schohn stated: “It was an overwhelmingly positive meeting. There wasn’t a lot of time to talk with her because she was meeting with all the affinity groups, so we each got a tiny chunk of time to be able to say something to her.”
January 29, 2009
NOLimits.org - Because we want to stay connected with the wonderful people we met and worked with all over the country in the last two years.
Because we want to share our ideas and experiences, our common goals, and nonpartisan solutions to the challenges that we face - and there are no limits to what we can achieve when we do.
And because we want to keep working for a better future for every child, from every family – a world in which no limits is not just our goal, but a reality!
NoLimits.org will "keep you up to date with news about issues on which Hillary took a lead and we know you care so much about," group President Ann Lewis said in an e-mail to as many as 2 million people culled from the Clinton campaign database.
Because No Limits is a registered nonprofit, "it cannot do anything political. It has to be nonpartisan," said Lewis, a longtime senior adviser to Clinton.
In Clinton's job as secretary of state for President Obama, her political dealings are highly restricted.
For example, she shut down her political action committee.
Some, like Democratic consultant and former Bill Clinton aide Chris Lehane, dismiss talk that the group could be a springboard for Clinton to try again for the White House in, say, 2016.
"Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar," Lehane said. "I think this is just [a] group of folks who developed relationships in an intense [electoral] environment and want to stay together."
But the University of Virginia's Larry Sabato countered: "Whenever a group like this says it's not a political organization, you just know it is."
"Maybe [this] is Hillary's answer to Obama's new 'change' group that controls his golden mailing list. Maybe it's a way for Secretary of State Clinton to mobilize backing for her objectives at the State Department," he said. "And maybe [it's] a standby committee of supporters in case Hillary decides to get back into elective politics."
Democratic consultant Hank Sheinkopf said NoLimits.org is "one way to make sure that she - and/or the former President - still have political leverage."
Hillary World-Wide January 26, 2009
Secretary of State Hillary R. Clinton Meets Afghan Women Lawyers. Secretary of State Hillary R. Clinton met today at the State Department with fourteen prominent Afghan women judges, prosecutors, and defense attorneys. These jurists were in Washington to participate in a training program arranged by the Department’s Public-Private Partnership for Justice Reform in Afghanistan. Secretary Clinton told them: "Your American friends greatly admire your bravery and courage. It is your work in the tough environment of Afghanistan for women lawyers that will bring real reform and the rule of law to the Afghan people. As President Obama made clear yesterday in his first foreign policy announcement, we are committed to supporting your efforts to bring security and stability to your country."